DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO7850-13
26 November 2013
ee,
eee,
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usec 1552.
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 November 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion (A/O) furnished by the Survivor Benefit Plan
(SBP) Program Manager Casualty Assistance {(PERS-13} memo of 23
September 2013, a Copy of which is being provided to you.
niter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion.
Therefore, your application for complete declination of your SBP
enrollment coverage since your retirement has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot pe taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
Docket No.NROQ7850-13
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
mae Spe tes wot
- t
4 W. DEAN PFEIRF
Executive Di tor
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5899 13
In June 2013, your husband sought 2 correction to his naval record to show that he enrolled his spouse, Ey -: the sole beneficiary of SBP within one year of his marriage. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4960-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when’ applying for a correction of an | official naval record, the burden is’on the ‘applicant .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6374 13
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4846-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office “having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07993-02
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. His RCSBP child began receiving retired pay on 18 April 1984. coverage became SBP child coverage on that date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00666-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10678-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 13 Apr 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04075-02
Your allegations of error and injustice adniinistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Docunientary material considered by the Board consisted of your A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with proceedings of this Board. application, together with all material and applicable statutes, opinion furnished by regl)lations and policies. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct only category of coverage effective 26...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08756-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Memo of 28 Nov 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00236-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ,,- -- _ - “ - _ it is clear that Senior Chief Bennett is not aware of Based on information contained in his application and the 3. enclosure, the criteria or procedures required to withdraw from the SBP. In response to Senior Chief * 4. widow can receive both SBP and portion of any SBP...